Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 15;14:1939161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1939161

Table 3.

Comparison of fitting parameter indexes of different latent profile models.

time Model AIC BIC aBIC Entropy LMR (p) BLMR (p) Class probability
T1 1 23923.804 23945.796 23922.064 – – – –
2 23274.773 23277.582 23277.342 0.852 0.004 <0.001 0.36/0.64
3 22811.262 22814.316 22806.203 0.891 0.048 <0.001 0.21/0.39/0.40
4 22132.177 22149.365 22148.738 0.912 0.121 0.079 0.24/0.11/0.22/0.43
T2 1 23835.341 23889.346 23827.650 – – – –
2 23108.675 23108.838 23113.712 0.875 0.000 <0.001 0.62/0.38
3 22607.296 22648.542 22618.638 0.903 0.039 <0.001 0.38/0.35/0.27
4 22004.417 22071.253 22014.156 0.922 0.135 0.125 0.27/0.17/0.22/0.34
T3 1 23742.156 23798.523 23735.891 – – – –
2 23056.234 23058.912 23061.445 0.886 0.000 <0.001 0.71/0.29
3 22589.123 22632.876 22595.234 0.912 0.027 <0.001 0.52/0.28/0.20
4 21976.543 22045.891 21988.654 0.928 0.142 <0.133 0.25/0.18/0.20/0.37

Bold lines indicate optimal model choices.