Table 5.

Association between acute psychological stress evolution trajectories and low cardiac rehabilitation participation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Models	Shift mode	B	SE	OR	95%CI	p-value
Model 1	Persistently low-stress (C1 → C1 → C1)	–	–	1.000 (Ref)	–	–
	persistently moderate-stress (C2 → C2 → C2)	1.417	0.325	4.124	2.156–7.892	<0.001
	Persistently high-stress (C3 → C3 → C3)	2.787	0.342	16.237	8.245–31.987	<0.001
	remitting (C3 → C2 → C1)	1.150	0.261	3.156	1.892–5.267	<0.001
	Fluctuating (C2 → C3 → C2)	1.830	0.351	6.234	3.145–12.356	<0.001
	Worsening (C1 → C2 → C3)	2.258	0.348	9.567	4.823–18.952	<0.001
Model 2	Persistently low-stress (C1 → C1 → C1)	–	–	1.000 (Ref)	–	–
	Persistently moderate-stress (C2 → C2 → C2)	1.218	0.338	3.381	1.742–6.563	0.002
	Persistently high-stress (C3 → C3 → C3)	2.521	0.365	12.445	6.078–25.478	<0.001
	remitting (C3 → C2 → C1)	0.982	0.272	2.669	1.568–4.545	0.003
	Fluctuating (C2 → C3 → C2)	1.625	0.332	5.078	2.648–9.735	<0.001
	Worsening (C1 → C2 → C3)	2.045	0.386	7.732	3.628–16.477	<0.001
Model 3	Persistently low-stress (C1 → C1 → C1)	–	–	1.000 (Ref)	–	–
	Persistently moderate-stress (C2 → C2 → C2)	1.045	0.315	2.845	1.542–5.248	0.012
	Persistently high-stress (C3 → C3 → C3)	2.326	0.351	10.237	5.128–20.415	<0.001
	remitting (C3 → C2 → C1)	0.768	0.258	2.156	1.298–3.582	0.006
	Fluctuating (C2 → C3 → C2)	1.508	0.288	4.521	2.567–7.965	<0.001
	Worsening (C1 → C2 → C3)	1.922	0.376	6.834	3.245–14.385	<0.001

Model 1: uncorrected; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, marriage, education, occupation, and income; Model 3: The number of comorbidities, number of stents, LVEF, cardiac function classification and T1 cardiac rehabilitation participation were adjusted on the basis of model 2.