Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 18;11(38):56667–56679. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.6c04481

2. Quantitative Comparison of Recent Development in Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Technologies.

technology conversion efficiency (%) energy requirement products technology readiness critical quantitative interpretation
MOFs 80–95 low-moderate CO, CH4 pilot-emerging high reported conversion efficiency, technology mature, and scale-up remain important limitations
electrochemical CO2 reduction 40–70 2–8 kWh per kg CO2 CO, ethylene, ethanol pilot-early commercial high conversion efficiency, but electricity demand can strongly influence environmental and economic performance
photocatalytic conversion − 0.2–1 solar-driven CH4, CO, methanol, HCOOH lab-pilot lower conversion efficiency, but potentially favorable where solar energy is available and process energy is low-carbon
biobased reduction 1–5 low biomass, biofuels commercial-pilot lower conversion efficiency but potentially lower transformation-energy requirements and compatibility with biological carbon-circularity pathways
artificial photosynthesis 1–10 solar-driven liquid fuels, methanol early stage solar-driven conversion provides sustainability potential, but efficiency and technology maturity remain major constraints