Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 7;26:1233. doi: 10.1186/s12877-026-07939-0

Table 4.

Demographic differences across latent profiles

Variable Profile 1
n = 29
Profile 2
n = 53
Profile 3
n = 129
Profile 4
n = 41
Profile 5
n = 258
p
Mean(SD) Mean(SD) Mean(SD) Mean(SD) Mean(SD)
Age 74.48(5.02) 68.85(3.31) 70.96(4.03) 71.93(4.22) 72.11(4.92) < 0.001
Education years 10.48(2.08) 12.79(1.83) 9.25(4.06) 10.46(3.55) 9.66(3.58) < 0.001
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Sex 
 Female 12(41.38) 22(41.51) 60(46.51) 26(63.41) 135(52.33) 0.163
 Male 17(58.62) 31(58.49) 69(53.49) 15(36.59) 123(47.67)
Living status
 Living together 9(31.03) 50(94.33) 57(44.19) 28(68.29) 198(76.74) < 0.001
 Living alone 20(68.97) 3(5.66) 72(55.81) 13(31.71) 60(23.26)
Economic status
 Middle/high 11(37.93) 36(67.92) 47(36.43) 18(43.90) 186(72.09) < 0.001
 Low 18(62.07) 17(32.08) 82(63.57) 23(56.10) 72(27.91)

Values are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Differences across profiles were examined using one-way ANOVA or Welch’s ANOVA for continuous variables, and chi-square tests for categorical variables

Profile 1 = High-Depression Vulnerable Group; Profile 2 Moderate-Depression Socially Connected High-Resource Group; Profile 3 = Low-Depression Socially Constrained Group; Profile 4 = Elevated-Depression Intermediate-Resource Group; Profile 5 = Low-Depression, High-Support, Limited-Network Group.