Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 7;26:1889. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-09174-w

Table 2.

Comparison of consistency values within and between models

Group ChatGPT 5.2 Gemini DeepSeek Test statistics p x
A 100 (100: 100) / 19,5 a 100 (83,33: 100) / 15,55 ab 95,83 (58,33: 100) / 11,45 b 6,912 0,032
B 100 (66,67: 100) / 15,75 100 (66,67: 100) / 16,35 100 (58,33: 100) / 14,4 0,367 0,832
C 100 (58,33: 100) / 13,65 100 (91,67: 100) / 18,35 100 (58,33: 100) / 14,5 2,676 0,262
D 100 (91,67: 100) / 16,65 ab 100 (100: 100) / 18 a 100 (83,33: 100) / 11,85 b 6,412 0,041
E 95,83 (75: 100) / 14,45 100 (50: 100) / 15,75 100 (83,33: 100) / 16,3 0,3 0,861
F 100 (100: 100) / 18 a 100 (100: 100) / 18 a 95,83 (66,67: 100) / 10,5 b 11,484 0,003
Total 100 (58,33: 100) / 94,94 a 100 (50: 100) / 99,93 a 100 (58,33: 100) / 76,63 b 11,015 0,004
Test statistics 13,028 8,260 1,348
p x 0,023 0,143 0,930

x Kruskal–Wallis H test; median (minimum–maximum)

a–b No significant difference between language models sharing the same letter. Bold values indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).