Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 18;39:16959. doi: 10.3389/ti.2026.16959

TABLE 4.

Research recommendations regarding prevention.

Future research recommendations: prevention
Azithromcyin
  • ⁃ Optimal timing of initiation after lung transplantation

  • ⁃ Whether treatment should be applied universally or targeted to specific risk groups

  • ⁃ Patient-reported outcome measures

  • ⁃ Evaluation of long-term effects, including impact on graft and overall survival

Tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine
  • ⁃ Long-term data on overall survival and graft survival; updated results from the ScanCLAD study are anticipated

  • ⁃ Comparative effects of once-daily, extended release vs. twice-daily, immediate-release dosing and of different tacrolimus formulations on renal outcomes and other side effects

  • ⁃ Management of unacceptable side effects, including thrombotic microangiopathy, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

  • ⁃ Comparative quality of life outcomes with tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine in lung transplantation; follow-up reports from the ScanCLAD study are expected

  • ⁃ Optimal trough levels for CNI at different time points after transplantation, including feasibility and safety of dose reduction

  • ⁃ Adjustment of CNI target levels based on kidney function, immunological risk, risk factors, and drug–drug interactions

  • ⁃ CNI-reduction or CNI-free immunosuppressive strategies, such as mTOR inhibitor-based quadruple low CNI maintenance immunosuppressive regimen vs. standard triple maintenance immunosuppressive regimen

  • ⁃ Best practices for therapeutic drug monitoring, including frequency, methodology, and dose adjustment

  • ⁃ Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine in lung transplantation

MMF vs. AZA
  • ⁃ Optimal dosing, considering pharmacogenetic factors beyond lymphopenia

  • ⁃ Definition of patient subgroups (e.g., those with telomeropathies) that may benefit preferentially from one agent

  • ⁃ Development of DSAs in patients receiving MMF vs. AZA

  • ⁃ Long-term effects of each cell cycle inhibitor

  • ⁃ Alternatives of cell cycle inhibitors, such as the use of mTOR inhibitors instead of MMF or AZA

  • ⁃ Timing and management of MMF discontinuation during infections and its impact on CLAD incidence

  • ⁃ Guidance on pausing cell cycle inhibitors around vaccinations

Other
  • ⁃ Clinical trials with novel drugs for preventing CLAD are an unmet need, and the Task Force recommends conducting well-designed RCTs (ideally multicenter RCTs and the use of CLAD adjudication) for CLAD prevention, in accordance with the recent ISHLT consensus statement on Lung Transplant Clinical Trials [105]

  • ⁃ Further studies on long-term outcomes of organ preservation strategies are needed to inform about the effects on CLAD incidence

  • ⁃ The use of specific HLA antibody/DSA-directed treatments and whether they reduce the risk of later CLAD development

  • ⁃ In patients with AMR, more data are needed on the efficacy of AMR treatments as a prevention of CLAD

  • ⁃ The role of inhaled immunosuppressive drugs, such as inhaled cyclosporine and mTOR inhibitors, in the prevention of CLAD

  • ⁃ Whether the addition of other immunomodulating or immunosuppressive drugs, such as belumosudil, ECP or tocilizumab, to standard triple immunosuppression has an impact on CLAD incidence

AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; AZA, azathioprine; CLAD, chronic lung allograft dysfunction; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; DSA, donor-specific antibody; ECP, extracorporeal photopheresis; HLA, human leukocyte antibody; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.