Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 21;14:1932711. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1932711

Table 4.

Training-process fidelity and AI-assessed movement quality by group.

Process indicator AI-wushu (n = 149) Conventional (n = 149) Group comparison
Training adherence, % (roll-call recorded) 89.1 ± 5.0 85.4 ± 5.5 t(296) = 6.03, p < 0.001
Engagement score (1–5) 4.10 ± 0.42 3.83 ± 0.49 t(296) = 5.13, p < 0.001
Exercise self-efficacy 32.10 ± 4.00 31.47 ± 3.68 t(296) = 1.42, p = 0.156
AI movement quality—pre 71.35 ± 7.53 70.14 ± 7.51 t(296) = 1.39, p = 0.166
AI movement quality—post 78.97 ± 8.15 75.05 ± 8.11 ANCOVA-adj. Δ = 2.69, p < 0.001
AI movement quality—Δ (within-group) +7.63 (d = 2.49) +4.91 (d = 1.53) both p < 0.001