Table 4.
Training-process fidelity and AI-assessed movement quality by group.
| Process indicator | AI-wushu (n = 149) | Conventional (n = 149) | Group comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training adherence, % (roll-call recorded) | 89.1 ± 5.0 | 85.4 ± 5.5 | t(296) = 6.03, p < 0.001 |
| Engagement score (1–5) | 4.10 ± 0.42 | 3.83 ± 0.49 | t(296) = 5.13, p < 0.001 |
| Exercise self-efficacy | 32.10 ± 4.00 | 31.47 ± 3.68 | t(296) = 1.42, p = 0.156 |
| AI movement quality—pre | 71.35 ± 7.53 | 70.14 ± 7.51 | t(296) = 1.39, p = 0.166 |
| AI movement quality—post | 78.97 ± 8.15 | 75.05 ± 8.11 | ANCOVA-adj. Δ = 2.69, p < 0.001 |
| AI movement quality—Δ (within-group) | +7.63 (d = 2.49) | +4.91 (d = 1.53) | both p < 0.001 |