Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 21;16:1938496. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1938496

Table 3.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 80 CRPA isolates.

Antimicrobial Overall R (%) Overall I (%) Overall S (%) XDR R (%) XDR I (%) XDR S (%) Non-XDR R (%) Non-XDR I (%) Non-XDR S (%) Rate difference in R, % (95% CI)
AMK 12.50 5.00 82.50 33.30 16.70 50.00 3.60 0.00 96.40 29.7 (10.2 to 49.2)
LVX 26.30 20.00 53.70 58.30 37.50 4.20 12.50 12.50 75.00 45.8 (24.3 to 67.3)
TZP 30.00 11.30 58.70 75.00 20.80 4.20 10.70 7.10 82.20 64.3 (45.2 to 83.4)
ATM 37.50 22.50 40.00 70.80 8.40 20.80 23.20 28.60 48.20 47.6 (26.3 to 68.9)
CAZ 25.00 12.50 62.50 70.80 20.80 8.40 5.40 8.90 85.70 65.4 (46.3 to 84.5)
FEP 21.30 16.30 62.40 66.70 25.00 8.30 1.80 12.50 85.70 64.9 (45.7 to 84.1)
IPM 83.70 16.30 0.00 91.70 8.30 0.00 80.40 19.60 0.00 11.3 (−3.9 to 26.5)
MEM 68.70 31.30 0.00 91.70 8.30 0.00 58.90 41.10 0.00 32.8 (15.8 to 49.8)
TOB 6.30 11.30 82.40 33.30 4.20 62.50 1.80 1.80 96.40 31.5 (12.3 to 50.7)

Resistance to the agents listed contributes to the XDR classification under the Magiorakos criteria. Differences between XDR and non-XDR isolates are therefore definitional and are presented for description only; no measures of association or hypothesis tests are reported for these comparisons. Rate differences refer to category R and are given with Wald 95% confidence intervals. R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible; CI, confidence interval; CRPA, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; XDR, extensively drug-resistant; AMK, amikacin; LVX, levofloxacin; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; TOB, tobramycin.