Table 3. Criteria findings.

Clinical utility criteria	N=248	Transparency criteria	N=248
Problem base, n (%)		Pre-registration, n (%)
Full	38.0 (15.3)	Full	99.0 (39.9)
Partial	168.0 (67.7)	Partial	63.0 (25.4)
Absent	42.0 (16.9)	Absent	86.0 (34.7)
Context placement, n (%)		Public protocol, n (%)
Full	192.0 (77.4)	Full	25.0 (10.1)
Partial	52.0 (21.0)	Partial	3.0 (1.2)
Absent	4.0 (1.6)	Absent	220.0 (88.7)
Information gain, n (%)		Adherence to protocol, n (%)
Full	176.0 (71.0)	Full	28.0 (11.3)
Partial	0.0 (0.0)	Partial	1.0 (0.4)
Absent	72.0 (29.0)	Absent	219.0 (88.3)
Pragmatism, n (%)		Funding stated, n (%)
Full	5.0 (2.0)	Full	181.0 (73.0)
Partial	6.0 (2.4)	Partial	5.0 (2.0)
Absent	237.0 (95.6)	Absent	62.0 (25.0)
Patient centeredness, n (%)		Conflicts of interest, n (%)
Full	248.0 (100.0)	Full	220.0 (88.7)
Partial	0.0 (0.0)	Partial	0.0 (0.0)
Absent	0.0 (0.0)	Absent	28.0 (11.3)
Value for money, n (%)		Raw data, n (%)
Full	0.0 (0.0)	Full	3.0 (1.2)
Partial	0.0 (0.0)	Partial	0.0 (0.0)
Absent	248.0 (100.0)	Absent	245.0 (98.8)
Feasibility, n (%)
Full	191.0 (77.0)
Partial	1.0 (0.4)
Absent	56.0 (22.6)