Table 1. Comparison of specific capacity/capacitance, energy density, and power density of the fabricated device with recently reported literature values.
| S. no. | Hybrid device | Specific capacity (Qs, C g−1) | Energy density (Ed, Wh kg−1) | Power density (Pd, W kg−1) | Cyclic stability (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sr–BTCA/PANI/NPG | 645.5 | 74.5 | 3200 | 91.1 | 25 |
| 2 | Ba–BTCA/Nd2O3 | 718 | 56.77 | 8000 | 92.0 | 26 |
| 3 | Co–B–H–BTCA | 172 | 42.5 | 4250 | 93.0 | 16 |
| 4 | Mn-MOF@BTTC | 627 | 25.0 | 532 | 91.0 | 17 |
| 5 | Co–VS/G | 1338 | 55.8 | 6100 | 88.9 | 12 |
| 6 | NVS/G | 862.2 | 64.7 | 5800 | 88.2 | 13 |
| 7 | NiCo–P/Ni3V2O8 | 934 | 51.0 | 4800 | 84.21 | 14 |
| 8 | NVP | 441 | 46.0 | 3750 | 83.0 | 15 |
| 9 | VPO4 | 460 | 56.0 | 6800 | 88.42 | This study |
| 10 | VS | 1550 | 66.0 | 6800 | 87.0 | This study |
| 11 | V–BTCA | 730 | 73.1 | 6800 | 92.31 | This study |