Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2003 Oct;26(5):435–458. doi: 10.1023/a:1025772001665

Table I.

Participants’ Characteristics and Descriptive Statistics of CES-D, SF-36, and LSNS Across Groups

CES-D scores
SF-36 Scores
LSNS Scores
Characteristics n % M SD M SD M SD
Total 146 9.5 7.3 73.6 19.2 9.0 3.5
Sex
 Male 67 45.9 9.1 7.0 73.0 19.3 9.4 3.5
 Female 79 54.1 9.9 7.5 74.2 19.3 8.7 3.4
Age group
 29–39 5 3.4 6.8 4.7 73.7 15.5 10.0 4.2
 40–49 23 15.8 9.4 5.4 78.2 11.8 9.3 3.4
 50–59 41 28.1 9.8 7.5 78.0 17.0 9.3 3.9
 60–69 37 25.3 9.2 6.8 70.9 21.7 7.9 2.8
 70 and over 40 27.4 10.0 8.8 69.2 22.0 9.6 3.4
Education group
 Non-high school graduate 39 26.7 12.1a 9.4 68.5 21.5 9.2 3.9
 High school graduate 70 47.9 8.0b 5.7 76.4 18.1 8.7 3.2
 Some college/tech training 23 15.8 10.7c 7.4 73.7 18.2 9.0 3.4
 College graduate 10 6.8 7.7b 4.5 74.8 18.1 11.0 3.6
Ethnicity
 Hawaiian/part–Hawaiian 59 40.4 10.6 6.9 76.2 15.5 8.6 3.5
 Filipino American 25 17.1 10.8 10.0 65.8 23.3 9.9 3.7
 Japanese American 21 14.4 6.8 6.4 78.4 20.5 8.6 2.5
 Caucasian 10 6.8 6.5 4.4 77.6 24.4 7.5 2.3
 Mixed ethnicity 31 21.2 9.3 6.1 70.3 18.0 10.2 3.8
Marital status
 Never married 18 12.3 7.2a 5.2 75.8 19.0 9.1 4.0
 Currently married 94 64.4 8.3a 6.4 74.8 18.2 9.0 3.4
 Disrupted marital status 34 23.4 14.0b 8.7 69.4 21.8 9.2 3.4
Diabetes diagnosis history
 Knowledge of diabetes 68 46.6 9.5 8.0 74.2 19.3 9.2 3.4
 No knowledge of diabetes 78 53.4 9.5 6.6 73.0 19.3 8.9 3.6
Social support
 High 91 64.5 8.5a 7.1 75.4 19.3 6.9a 1.2
 Low 50 35.5 11.3b 7.3 70.5 18.8 13.0b 2.8
HbA1c (%)
 Low HbA1c <7% 71 48.6 8.6 6.6 73.8 19.7 9.4 3.5
 Moderate HbA1c 7–9% 46 31.5 10.3 7.7 71.9 18.9 9.0 3.8
 High HbA1c >9.0% 29 19.9 9.5 8.1 76.4 19.1 8.3 2.6
BMI
 ≥30 75 51.4 10.6 6.8 76.4 22.0 9.0 3.5
 <30 63 43.2 8.6 7.6 71.0 15.6 9.3 3.3
WHR
 Women ≥0.9 54 70.1 10.3 7.8 72.6 20.3 9.1 3.7
 <0.9 23 29.9 9.0 1.4 77.9 16.8 8.0 2.6
 Men ≥0.8 62 96.9 9.3 7.1 72.9 19.4 9.4 3.4
 <0.8 2 3.1 4.0 0.0 77.2 17.3 12.0 8.5

Note. Means with different subscripts differ significantly at p < .05 by Tukey’s β significant difference comparison. N = 141 for all ANOVA analysis due to missing data, except for BMI and WHR. N = 134 for BMI and WHR was N = 77 for women and N = 64 for men. CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies—Depression Scale; SF-36 = SF-36 Health Survey; and LSNS = Lubben Social Network Scale.