Table 2.
Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
| ||
Categorical | ||
| ||
NPCR program administered by designee? | ||
| ||
Yes | 9 | 20.5 |
No | 35 | 79.5 |
| ||
NPCR program type | ||
| ||
Enhancement (existing registry) | 35 | 79.5 |
Planning (newly established registry) | 9 | 20.5 |
| ||
High-quality 1999 incidence data? | ||
| ||
Yes | 33 | 75.0 |
No | 11 | 25.0 |
| ||
Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program metropolitan area or special population within NPCR catchment area? | ||
| ||
Yes | 6 | 13.6 |
No | 38 | 86.4 |
| ||
2000 consumer price index | ||
| ||
South (167.2)a | 16 | 36.4 |
West (174.8)a | 10 | 22.7 |
Midwest (168.3)a | 10 | 22.7 |
Northeast (179.4)a | 8 | 18.2 |
| ||
Characteristics | Mean (SD) | Percentage Range |
| ||
Continuous | ||
| ||
Percentage of urban population (1990 census) | 68.4 (15.4) | 32.2 (Vermont)- 100.0 (District of Columbia) |
Area (sq miles) | 7194 (9073) | 61.4 (District of Columbia)-570,374 (Alaska) |
Treated as a continuous variable in the analysis.