Table 1.
Feasibility and Importance Ratings for Less Prevalent Chronic Conditions (LPCCs) Clusters
| Cluster Name | Feasibility | Importance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratinga | Rank | Ratingb | Rank | |
| Partnerships and coalitions | 3.32 | 1 | 3.54 | 5 |
| Assessment and evaluation | 3.21 | 2 | 3.55 | 4 |
| Professional education | 3.10 | 3 | 3.34 | 7 |
| Planning and capacity building | 3.02 | 4 | 3.59 | 3 |
| Disease management and coordination of care | 2.97 | 5 | 3.61 | 2 |
| Community education | 2.86 | 6 | 3.20 | 9 |
| Data and research | 2.80 | 7 | 3.49 | 6 |
| Information, referral, and support | 2.78 | 8 | 3.27 | 8 |
| Health care policy and cost | 2.68 | 9 | 3.77 | 1 |
a
Scale of 1-5; higher scores reflect greater feasibility.
b
Scale of 1-5; higher scores reflect greater importance.