Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 24;13:1888658. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1888658

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of categorical variables.

Sub-group N K SMD 95% CI P Sig. τ 2 I 2 Beta
Cognitive category
Executive function 9 19 0.34 0.15 0.53 <0.01 Yes 0.02 0 ns
Psychomotor speed 6 9 0.5 0.24 0.75 <0.01 Yes 0.07 33 ns
Attention 6 8 0.55 0.26 0.83 <0.01 Yes 0 0 ref
Data type
Completion time 12 21 0.55 0.38 0.72 <0.01 Yes 0.01 3 ns
Accuracy 11 16 0.21 0.002 0.42 <0.05 Yes 0 0 ref
Population
Athletes 8 20 0.47 0.29 0.65 <0.01 Yes 0.05 24 ref
general 5 15 0.41 0.21 0.62 <0.01 Yes 0 0 ns
Administration route
Capsule 10 28 0.46 0.30 0.62 <0.01 Yes 0 0 ns
Liquid 3 7 0.49 0.21 0.76 <0.01 Yes 0.05 21 ref
Gender
Male 8 17 0.33 0.14 0.51 <0.01 Yes 0.04 22 ns
Female 3 13 0.47 0.19 0.76 <0.01 Yes 0.04 10 ns
Unclear 3 7 0.54 0.28 0.79 <0.01 Yes 0 0 ref

N, number of studies; K, number of effect sizes; SMD, standardized mean difference; 95% CI, lower and upper confidence intervals; P, significance value; τ2, measure of variation around average; I2, measure of proportion of observed variance (%); Beta, regression coefficients for between-subgroup comparisons; ref, reference category; ns, no significant difference compared to reference category.