Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1968 Sep;198(1):103–125. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008596

Effects of nerve cross-union on fast-twitch and slow-graded muscle fibres in the toad

R Close, J F Y Hoh
PMCID: PMC1365312  PMID: 16992308

Abstract

1. A method is described for resolving isometric tetanic tension developed by fast-twitch and slow-graded components of heterogeneous toad muscles. This makes use of the difference in threshold for excitation of low threshold nerve fibres which normally innervate the fast-twitch muscle fibres and high threshold nerve fibres which innervate slow-graded muscle fibres.

2. The sartorius muscle contains only fast-twitch muscle fibres whereas the posterior semitendinosus (PST) contains both fast-twitch and slow-graded muscle fibres, the latter contributing 10-15% of the maximum isometric tetanic tension.

3. Following surgical cross-union of nerve to sartorius and PST muscles, both the fast-twitch and slow-graded muscle fibre components of the PST are reinnervated by low threshold nerves originally innervating sartorius fast-twitch fibres, and sartorius fast-twitch muscle fibres are reinnervated by both low threshold and high threshold nerves formerly supplying the fast-twitch and slow-graded muscle fibre components of the PST.

4. The characteristic mechanical responses of fast-twitch muscle fibres and slow-graded muscle fibres were not transformed up to 134 and 200 days respectively following nerve cross-union.

5. PST nerve partially innervated the sartorius muscle whereas sartorius nerves completely innervated the PST muscle. Isometric tetanic tension declined markedly during repetitive indirect stimulation of cross-innervated sartorius muscles, whereas the tetanic contractions of cross-innervated PST showed a plateau of tension and resembled the response of normal muscles.

6. Normal, cross-innervated and self-innervated PST muscles gave sustained contractures in the presence of acetylcholine whereas PST muscles denervated for 120 days gave phasic contractures similar to those of normal, cross-innervated and self-innervated sartorius muscles.

Full text

PDF
103

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aitken J. T., Sharman M., Young J. Z. Maturation of regenerating nerve fibres with various peripheral connexions. J Anat. 1947 Jan;81(Pt 1):1–22.2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitken J. T. The effect of peripheral connexions on the maturation of regenerating nerve fibres. J Anat. 1949 Jan;83(Pt 1):32–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BERNSTEIN J. J., GUTH L. Nonselectivity in establishment of neuromuscular connections following nerve regeneration in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1961 Sep;4:262–275. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(61)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BOYD I. A. Uniform staining of nerve endings in skeletal muscle with gold chloride. Stain Technol. 1962 Jul;37:225–230. doi: 10.3109/10520296209117741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BULLER A. J., ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M. Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BULLER A. J., LEWIS D. M. FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON MAMMALIAN CROSS-INNERVATED SKELETAL MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:343–358. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Close R. Effects of cross-union of motor nerves to fast and slow skeletal muscles. Nature. 1965 May 22;206(4986):831–832. doi: 10.1038/206831a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubowitz V. Cross-innervated mammalian skeletal muscle: histochemical, physiological and biochemical observations. J Physiol. 1967 Dec;193(3):481–496.3. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elsberg C. A. EXPERIMENTS ON MOTOR NERVE REGENERATION AND THE DIRECT NEUROTIZATION OF PARALYZED MUSCLES BY THEIR OWN AND BY FOREIGN NERVES. Science. 1917 Mar 30;45(1161):318–320. doi: 10.1126/science.45.1161.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GRAY E. G. The spindle and extrafusal innervation of a frog muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):416–430. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HESS A. The structure of extrafusal muscle fibers in the frog and their innervation studied by the cholinesterase technique. Am J Anat. 1960 Sep;107:129–151. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001070204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hník P., Jirmanová I., Vyklický L., Zelená J. Fast and slow muscles of the chick after nerve cross-union. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):309–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KRNJEVIC K., MILEDI R. Failure of neuromuscular propagation in rats. J Physiol. 1958 Mar 11;140(3):440–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KUFFLER S. W., VAUGHAN WILLIAMS E. M. Small-nerve junctional potentials; the distribution of small motor nerves to frog skeletal muscle, and the membrane characteristics of the fibres they innervate. J Physiol. 1953 Aug;121(2):289–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LAENNERGREN J. FAT IN TWITCH AND SLOW MUSCLE FIBRES. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Jan-Feb;63:193–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MILEDI R. Properties of regenerating neuromuscular synapses in the frog. J Physiol. 1960 Nov;154:190–205. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miledi R., Orkand P. Effect of a "fast" nerve on "slow" muscle fibres in the frog. Nature. 1966 Feb 12;209(5024):717–718. doi: 10.1038/209717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Romanul F. C., Van der Meulen J. P. Slow and fast muscles after cross innervation. Enzymatic and physiological changes. Arch Neurol. 1967 Oct;17(4):387–402. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1967.00470280053006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sperry R. W., Arora H. L. Selectivity in regeneration of the oculomotor nerve in the cichlid fish, Astronotus ocellatus. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1965 Dec;14(3):307–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. THOMSON J. D., MORGAN J. A., HINES H. M. Physiologic characteristics of regenerating mammalian nerve and muscle. Am J Physiol. 1950 Apr 1;161(1):142–150. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1950.161.1.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tomanek R. J., Tipton C. M. Influence of exercise and tenectomy on the morphology of a muscle nerve. Anat Rec. 1967 Sep;159(1):105–113. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091590114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zelená J., Vyklický L., Jirmanová I. Motor end-plates in fast and slow muscles of the chick after cross-union of their nerves. Nature. 1967 Jun 3;214(5092):1010–1011. doi: 10.1038/2141010a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES