Abstract
1. Grating patterns were used to obtain a quantitative description of cells in the visual cortex of the cat whose response amplitude depended critically upon the orientation of the moving grating.
2. In all such cells the impulse frequency was found to decrease linearly with angle on either side of an optimum angle (the preferred angle) until the response fell to zero or to a base frequency. The angular rate of change of response varied between cells and was expressed as the half-width at half amplitude (the angular selectivity).
3. The angular selectivity of thirty-five cells was determined and more than half (nineteen) of these fell within the range 14-26°.
4. Fourteen cells responded optimally only when the grating was moved in one direction. Twenty-one cells responded optimally to two directions of movement 180° apart, but the response in the two directions was not always equal.
5. No significant correlation was found between the response amplitude at the optimum angle and the angular selectivity.
6. The distribution of preferred angles did not show any difference between the oblique orientations and the vertical and horizontal orientations.
7. These results are compared with a previous psychophysical estimate of angular selectivity.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andrews D. P. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. I: short lines. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):975–997. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barlow H. B., Blakemore C., Pettigrew J. D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):327–342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):576–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell F. W., Kulikowski J. J. Orientational selectivity of the human visual system. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):437–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):517–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUBEL D. H. Single unit activity in lateral geniculate body and optic tract of unrestrained cats. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:91–104. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:229–289. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:574–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubel D. H. Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units. Science. 1957 Mar 22;125(3247):549–550. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3247.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TAYLOR M. M. Visual discrimination and orientation. J Opt Soc Am. 1963 Jun;53:763–765. doi: 10.1364/josa.53.000763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]