. 2026 Jul 14;9:781. doi: 10.1038/s41746-026-02977-9

Table 2.

Survival analysis performance (C^td-index) on the Mayo cohort test set

Task: Ischemic
Models	1-M		2-M		3-M		6-M		9-M		12-M
Models	C^td-index^a	p-value^b	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value
DeepSurv	0.83 (0.80-0.85)	0.422	0.84 (0.83–0.85)	<0.001	0.84 (0.83–0.85)	<0.001	0.84 (0.83–0.85)	<0.001	0.83 (0.82–0.84)	<0.001	0.82 (0.81–0.83)	<0.001
DeepHit	0.80 (0.78–0.82)	0.008	0.84 (0.84–0.85)	<0.001	0.85 (0.84–0.86)	<0.001	0.85 (0.85–0.86)	<0.001	0.84 (0.83–0.85)	<0.001	0.83 (0.82–0.84)	<0.001
Transformer-DAPT	0.84 (0.81–0.86)	Reference	0.86 (0.86–0.87)	Reference	0.87 (0.86–0.87)	Reference	0.87 (0.86–0.88)	Reference	0.86 (0.85–0.86)	Reference	0.85 (0.84–0.85)	Reference

Task: Bleeding
Models	1-M		2-M		3-M		6-M		9-M		12-M
Models	C^td-index^a	p-value^b	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value	C^td-index	p-value
DeepSurv	0.76 (0.66–0.85)	0.004	0.77 (0.74– 0.8)	<0.001	0.76 (0.73–0.79)	<0.001	0.76 (0.74–0.78)	<0.001	0.73 (0.71–0.75)	<0.001	0.71 (0.69–0.73)	<0.001
DeepHit	0.84 (0.75–0.91)	0.100	0.82 (0.79–0.84)	<0.001	0.81 (0.79–0.83)	<0.001	0.81 (0.79–0.82)	<0.001	0.78 (0.77–0.80)	<0.001	0.76 (0.74–0.77)	<0.001
Transformer-DAPT	0.88 (0.83–0.93)	Reference	0.87 (0.86–0.89)	Reference	0.87 (0.86–0.88)	Reference	0.87 (0.86–0.88)	Reference	0.84 (0.82–0.85)	Reference	0.81 (0.79–0.82)	Reference

C^td-index, time-dependent concordance index.

^aThe model performance (C^td-index) was calculated by employing bootstrapping on the test dataset.

^bp-values represent statistical comparison between each model and the reference model (Transformer-DAPT), determined using bootstrap-based statistical testing with 1000 resamples. Lower p-values indicate significant performance differences compared with the reference model.