Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 14;9:781. doi: 10.1038/s41746-026-02977-9

Table 3.

Survival analysis performance (Ctd-index) on the OneFlorida+ cohort test set

Task: Ischemic
Models 1-M 2-M 3-M 6-M 9-M 12-M
Ctd-indexa p-valueb Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value
DeepSurv 0.72 (0.57–0.84) 0.118 0.69 (0.66–0.72) <0.001 0.71 (0.69–0.74) <0.001 0.70 (0.67–0.72) <0.001 0.685 (0.67–0.70) <0.001 0.678 (0.66–0.70) <0.001
DeepHit 0.75 (0.62–0.85) 0.108 0.74 (0.72–0.77) 0.004 0.74 (0.72–0.77) <0.001 0.75 (0.73–0.76) <0.001 0.73 (0.71–0.75) <0.001 0.72 (0.71–0.74) <0.001
Transformer-DAPT 0.84 (0.74–0.92) Reference 0.77 (0.75–0.79) Reference 0.77 (0.76–0.79) Reference 0.77 (0.76–0.79) Reference 0.75 (0.74–0.77) Reference 0.74 (0.73–0.76) Reference
Task: Bleeding
Models 1-M 2-M 3-M 6-M 9-M 12-M
Ctd-indexa p-valueb Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value Ctd-index p-value
DeepSurv 0.79 (0.65–0.89) 0.424 0.71 (0.67–0.76) <0.001 0.72 (0.69–0.75) <0.001 0.72 (0.69–0.74) <0.001 0.70 (0.68–0.73) <0.001 0.70 (0.68–0.72) <0.001
DeepHit 0.80 (0.72–0.88) 0.484 0.75 (0.71–0.79) 0.020 0.74 (0.71–0.77) <0.001 0.75 (0.73–0.77) <0.001 0.72 (0.70–0.74) <0.001 0.71 (0.69–0.73) <0.001
Transformer-DAPT 0.83 (0.74–0.89) Reference 0.79 (0.76–0.83) Reference 0.79 (0.76–0.81) Reference 0.79 (0.76–0.81) Reference 0.76 (0.74–0.78) Reference 0.75 (0.74–0.77) Reference

Ctd-index, time-dependent concordance index.

aThe model performance (Ctd-index) was calculated by employing bootstrapping on the test dataset.

bp-values represent statistical comparison between each model and the reference model (Transformer-DAPT), determined using bootstrap-based statistical testing with 1000 resamples. Lower p-values indicate significant performance differences compared with the reference model.