Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 25;5(6):100786. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100786

Table II.

Subdomains included in asthma remission definitions in studies explicitly assessing remission

Study Time Number of subdomains No medications
No exacerbation Absence of symptoms Normal lung function Other % Achieving remission
No OCS No ICS No rescue medication
Pumputiene et al (2006)24 12 mo 2 × ×
∗FEV1 ≥80%
NR
Manuyakorn et al (2008)25 12 mo 3 × × ×
FEV1 > 80% and FEV1/FVC > 80%
NR
Covar et al (2011)26 12 mo 3 × × × × × 4
Andersson et al (2013)30 36 mo 2 × × × ×
Absence of wheezing
10
Odajima et al (2017)23 NR 1 ×
JPAC = 15/15
40
Longo et al (2021)21 24 mo 3 × × × × ×
Absence of hospitalization or physician visit for asthma
41.5
Bacharier et al (2024)22 12m 4 × ×
ACQ5 < 0.75
× z Score > -1.64 for FEV1 and FEV1/FVC 41.9 for children receiving dupilumab; 23.7 in the placebo group

The “×” symbol indicates that the absence of the domain was explicitly required as part of the remission definition for the specified duration. Blank cells indicate that the domain was not included in the study’s remission definition. DeBoer et al28 were excluded from this table because no explicit definition of asthma remission was provided. Notably, no study incorporated biologic or inflammatory markers as part of their remission definitions.

ACQ-5, Asthma Control Questionnaire 5; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, Inhaled corticosteroids; JPAC, Japanese Pediatric Asthma Control questionnaire; NR, not reported; OCS, oral corticosteroids.