Table 3.

Fit indices for the one- to seven-profile solutions.

No. of profiles	Free parameters	LL	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	VLMR p	BLRT p	Smallest profile
1	12	−3405.452	6834.905	6882.803	6844.726	–	–	–	400 (100.0%)
2	19	−3139.349	6316.698	6392.536	6332.248	0.826	<0.001	–	114 (28.5%)
3	26	−3027.979	6107.957	6211.735	6129.235	0.838	0.011	–	62 (15.5%)
4	33	−2973.296	6012.593	6144.311	6039.600	0.793	0.146	–	44 (11.0%)
5	40	−2928.410	5936.821	6096.479	5969.557	0.862	0.187	–	31 (7.75%)
6	47	−2889.984	5873.968	6061.567	5912.433	0.850	0.131	< 0.001	21 (5.25%)
7	54	−2867.571	5843.142	6058.681	5887.335	0.845	0.098	–	2 (0.50%)

The seven-profile model yielded a two-person profile and a nonidentification warning.

BLRT was additionally evaluated for the focal comparison between the five- and six-profile solutions; the six-profile model was favored over the five-profile model, 2ΔLL = 76.852, p < 0.001.

Bold values indicate the retained primary six-profile solution.