Table 4.
Profile sizes, classification quality, and standardized indicator means.
| Profile | n | % | Post. prob. | OES | OMS | LES | LMS | CES | CMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very low overall support profile | 21 | 5.25 | 0.919 | −1.940 | −1.766 | −1.901 | −1.815 | −1.172 | −1.146 |
| Low overall support profile | 69 | 17.25 | 0.865 | −0.643 | −0.720 | −0.858 | −1.149 | −0.497 | −0.792 |
| Moderate balanced support profile | 161 | 40.25 | 0.893 | −0.066 | −0.065 | 0.043 | 0.179 | −0.270 | −0.047 |
| Relational support-dominant profile | 32 | 8.00 | 0.892 | −0.883 | −0.900 | 0.423 | 0.286 | 1.143 | 1.099 |
| Organizational support-dominant profile | 37 | 9.25 | 0.931 | 1.518 | 1.499 | 0.643 | 0.581 | −0.204 | −0.899 |
| High balanced support profile | 80 | 20.00 | 0.895 | 0.861 | 0.895 | 0.688 | 0.728 | 0.902 | 1.039 |
All six indicators are full-sample z scores; Entropy = 0.850. Profile labels were based on relative profile shapes and do not represent absolute diagnostic cutoffs on the scales.