Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 28;17:1961537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1961537

Table 4.

Profile sizes, classification quality, and standardized indicator means.

Profile n % Post. prob. OES OMS LES LMS CES CMS
Very low overall support profile 21 5.25 0.919 −1.940 −1.766 −1.901 −1.815 −1.172 −1.146
Low overall support profile 69 17.25 0.865 −0.643 −0.720 −0.858 −1.149 −0.497 −0.792
Moderate balanced support profile 161 40.25 0.893 −0.066 −0.065 0.043 0.179 −0.270 −0.047
Relational support-dominant profile 32 8.00 0.892 −0.883 −0.900 0.423 0.286 1.143 1.099
Organizational support-dominant profile 37 9.25 0.931 1.518 1.499 0.643 0.581 −0.204 −0.899
High balanced support profile 80 20.00 0.895 0.861 0.895 0.688 0.728 0.902 1.039

All six indicators are full-sample z scores; Entropy = 0.850. Profile labels were based on relative profile shapes and do not represent absolute diagnostic cutoffs on the scales.