Table 5.
BCH-adjusted means of teaching efficacy across the support profiles.
| Profile | GTE M | SE | 95% CI | PTE M | SE | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very low overall support profile | 2.663 | 0.164 | [2.342, 2.984] | 3.129 | 0.113 | [2.908, 3.350] |
| Low overall support profile | 3.245 | 0.099 | [3.051, 3.440] | 3.554 | 0.078 | [3.401, 3.706] |
| Moderate balanced support profile | 3.566 | 0.063 | [3.442, 3.689] | 3.703 | 0.048 | [3.610, 3.797] |
| Relational support-dominant profile | 3.717 | 0.147 | [3.430, 4.005] | 3.908 | 0.137 | [3.639, 4.177] |
| Organizational support-dominant profile | 4.193 | 0.096 | [4.005, 4.381] | 4.276 | 0.074 | [4.130, 4.422] |
| High balanced support profile | 4.105 | 0.078 | [3.952, 4.257] | 4.185 | 0.071 | [4.046, 4.324] |
Profile labels were based on the relative shapes of the six support indicators and do not represent absolute diagnostic classifications on the scales.
Overall test for GTE: χ2(5) = 131.378, p < 0.001; overall test for PTE: χ2(5) = 130.502, p < 0.001.