Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 28;17:1961537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1961537

Table 5.

BCH-adjusted means of teaching efficacy across the support profiles.

Profile GTE M SE 95% CI PTE M SE 95% CI
Very low overall support profile 2.663 0.164 [2.342, 2.984] 3.129 0.113 [2.908, 3.350]
Low overall support profile 3.245 0.099 [3.051, 3.440] 3.554 0.078 [3.401, 3.706]
Moderate balanced support profile 3.566 0.063 [3.442, 3.689] 3.703 0.048 [3.610, 3.797]
Relational support-dominant profile 3.717 0.147 [3.430, 4.005] 3.908 0.137 [3.639, 4.177]
Organizational support-dominant profile 4.193 0.096 [4.005, 4.381] 4.276 0.074 [4.130, 4.422]
High balanced support profile 4.105 0.078 [3.952, 4.257] 4.185 0.071 [4.046, 4.324]

Profile labels were based on the relative shapes of the six support indicators and do not represent absolute diagnostic classifications on the scales.

Overall test for GTE: χ2(5) = 131.378, p < 0.001; overall test for PTE: χ2(5) = 130.502, p < 0.001.