Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 14;27(10):961–972. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2026.0458

Table 3. OS, local PFS, PFS before and after IPTW.

Before IPTW After IPTW
TARE (n = 119) TACE (n = 187) P * TACEinitial†(n = 148) TACEhigh LSF†(n = 39) P ‡ TARE TACE P
Median OS 79.6 (NA–NA) 46.5 (29.6–63.4) 0.004 56.0 (35.4–76.6) 20.3 (13.1–27.5) 0.075 79.6 (69.3–NA) 53.4 (40.1–75.6) 0.033
Median local PFS 28.1 (16.1–40.1) 9.3 (6.9–11.7) 0.001 10.2 (7.9–12.4) 5.5 (2.6–8.4) 0.572 25.1 (14.2–NA) 9.5 (7.8–13.6) 0.001
Median PFS 11.7 (7.5–15.8) 7.1 (5.5–8.7) 0.017 8.8 (6.8–10.8) 4.0 (3.3–4.7) 0.005 9.8 (7.9–20.7) 7.8 (6.4–10.2) 0.066

Data are presented as months with the 95% confidence interval in parentheses.

*For comparing TARE (n = 119) and TACE (n = 187) over the entire follow-up period using the log-rank text, ‡For comparing TACEinitial (n = 148) and TACEhigh LSF (n = 39) over the entire follow-up period using the log-rank test, †TACEinitial and TACEhigh LSF indicate those who underwent TACE as initial treatment plan and patients who were initially planned for TARE but ultimately received TACE due to a high estimated lung dose, respectively.

OS = overall survival, PFS = progression-free survival, IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weighting, TACE = transarterial chemoembolization, LSF = lung shunt fraction, TARE = transarterial radioembolization, NA = not applicable