Table 1.
Evidence tiers and clinical actionability of precision tools in hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Evidence tier | Precision tool | Potential clinical role | Current actionability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Established | Liver reserve, portal hypertension, tumor burden, resectability, performance status, transplant criteria | Treatment selection and surgical candidacy | Direct clinical decision |
| Investigational | Radiomics | Risk stratification and prediction of recurrence/MVI | MDT discussion/research |
| Investigational | ctDNA/liquid biopsy | MRD and recurrence-risk assessment | Research/trial enrollment |
| Investigational | Genomic/immune profiling | Biological characterization and treatment-response assessment | Research/trial enrollment |
| Investigational | AI/digital pathology | Risk and biological phenotype prediction | Decision support/research |
| Future hypotheses | Multi-omics integration | Dynamic biological phenotyping | Not currently actionable |
| Future hypotheses | Digital twins/multimodal AI | Treatment simulation and individualized prediction | Not currently actionable |
| Future hypotheses | Digital biomarkers/wearables/learning health systems | Continuous monitoring and evidence generation | Not currently actionable |