Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 9;105(41):e51070. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000051070

Table 2.

Sensitivity analyses: associations between blood heavy metal levels and constipation.

Exposure Primary analysis (model 3) OR (95% CI) P Sensitivity 1: Excluding eGFR OR (95% CI) P Sensitivity 2: Excluding extreme values OR (95% CI) P
Continuous variables (log-transformed)
 Lead 0.496 (0.331–0.745) .004 0.502 (0.336–0.750) .003 0.459 (0.248–0.850) .02
 Cadmium 1.009 (0.759–1.343) .94 1.013 (0.768–1.335) .92 1.091 (0.653–1.824) .71
 Mercury 0.701 (0.542–0.905) .01 0.700 (0.544–0.900) .01 0.752 (0.583–0.969) .03
Categorical variables (quartiles)
 Lead Q1 Reference – Reference – – –
 Lead Q2 0.759 (0.546–1.057) .08 0.761 (0.571–1.015) .06 – –
 Lead Q3 0.642 (0.419–0.985) .05 0.646 (0.443–0.941) .03 – –
 Lead Q4 0.690 (0.417–1.143) .10 0.695 (0.449–1.077) .08 – –
 Cadmium Q1 Reference – Reference – – –
 Cadmium Q2 0.763 (0.544–1.071) .09 0.765 (0.571–1.024) .06 – –
 Cadmium Q3 0.822 (0.554–1.221) .21 0.824 (0.584–1.163) .19 – –
 Cadmium Q4 0.908 (0.539–1.528) .60 0.910 (0.581–1.425) .59 – –
 Mercury Q1 Reference – Reference – – –
 Mercury Q2 0.802 (0.579–1.109) .12 0.801 (0.604–1.064) .10 – –
 Mercury Q3 0.835 (0.552–1.262) .26 0.834 (0.582–1.195) .23 – –
 Mercury Q4 0.673 (0.463–0.980) .04 0.673 (0.485–0.933) .03 – –

The primary analysis was fully adjusted as in model 3.

Sensitivity analysis 1 excluded adjustment for eGFR.

Sensitivity analysis 2 excluded extreme metal values (below the first percentile or above the 99th percentile) and was performed only for continuous exposure models.

ORs and 95% CIs were estimated using survey-weighted logistic regression models.

CI = confidence interval, eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, OR = odds ratio.