Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 19;60(10):2634–2646. doi: 10.1007/s43465-026-01861-8

Table 2.

Risk of bias assessment results for included studies

Included studies Randomization method Blinding Allocation concealment Integrity of outcome data Selective outcome reporting Other sources of bias
Arash et al., 2024 [18] Computer-generated Not specified Sealed envelopes No dropouts No Not specified
Yagci et al., 2024 [19] Not specified Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Ji et al. 2024 [20] Grouped by treatment time Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Liu et al., 2023 [21] Coin toss Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Liao 2022 [22] Random number table Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Hu 2022 [23] Computer-generated Single-blind Sealed envelopes No dropouts No Not specified
Guo 2021 [24] Not specified Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Zeng et al., 2020 [25] Random number table Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Liu et al., 2019 [26] Not specified Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified
Zhou et al., 2016 [27] Random number table Not specified Not specified No dropouts No Not specified

Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration criteria. "Not specified" denotes that a study provided insufficient details to judge a domain's risk of bias. "No dropouts" indicates all participants completed the study, resulting in a low-risk judgment for outcome data integrity. All assessments were based solely on information reported in the original publications