Skip to main content
. 2002 Nov;76(21):10972–10979. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.21.10972-10979.2002

TABLE 4.

Intracellular virus neutralization by IgA antibodies to F, N, and H and by antibody combinationsa

IgA MAb (μg/ml) Apical supernatant
Cell lysate
Virus titer (10−3 PFU/ ml) % Reduction of virusb Virus titer (10−5 PFU/ ml) % Reduction of virusb
Anti-H (100) 0.48 ± 0.04c 98 0.93 ± 0.16c 84
Anti-F (100) 18.9 ± 1.80d 26 2.52 ± 0.28c 57e
Anti-N (100) 16.8 ± 2.40d 34 2.25 ± 0.26c 62e
Anti-H (50) 6.12 ± 0.69c 76 1.70 ± 0.39c 71
Anti-H (33) 8.06 ± 0.52c 68 1.96 ± 0.46c 66
Anti-H (50) + anti-F (50) 2.05 ± 0.79c 92 2.13 ± 0.51c 64e
Anti-H (50) + anti-N (50) 1.67 ± 0.53c 93 2.28 ± 0.76c 61e
Anti-F (50) + anti-N (50) 25.2 ± 2.40d 1 3.91 ± 0.65c 33e
Anti-H (33) + anti-F (33) + anti-N (33) 3.29 ± 0.77c 87 2.33 ± 0.54c 60e
Irrelevant (100) 25.5 ± 4.90 0 5.81 ± 1.02 1
None 25.5 ± 5.10 0 5.85 ± 0.28 0
a

Experiments were repeated on at least three occasions with similar results. Results of a representative experiment are shown. Data are mean ± standard deviations (n = 3).

b

Compared to no-antibody control.

c

Mean virus titers were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than those from cells exposed to no antibody.

d

Mean virus titers were not significantly lower (P > 0.05) than those from cells exposed to no antibody.

e

A significantly smaller percent reduction (P < 0.04) than that with anti-H alone at 100 μg/ml.