Skip to main content
. 2005 May 13;89(2):1214–1226. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.055780

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The normalized ratio, Inline graphic (Inline graphic) plotted versus the 15N-{1H} NOE for the experimental CaM relaxation data. The normalization constant Inline graphic is RT1 in the absence of any internal motion. Inline graphic was calculated with a 15N CSA of −170 ppm and a Inline graphic of 10 ns, the average overall tumbling time for the CaM dimer (vide infra). RT1 was also corrected for the linear NOE dependence for fast (<200 ps) internal motion. The Inline graphic contours of the theoretical Inline graphic are shown for a one-contribution model (solid black Inline graphic contours), and a two-contribution model (dotted red Inline graphic contours). In both theoretical models, τif is running from 20 ps to 6 ns. In the two-contribution model, an additional 2.5 ns internal motion is present with Inline graphic = 0.8. Guidelines for internal motions of 1.0 and 2.5 ns for the one-contribution model is outlined with dashed black lines. The experimental CaM data are overlaid on top of theoretical Inline graphic curves, and are normalized with the same Inline graphic as the theoretical curves. The average error in the Inline graphic and Inline graphic is 1.0 and 2.5%, respectively. Hence, the error in the experimental Inline graphic equals 3.5%. The shaded area represents the area where residues are only affected by picosecond-timescale internal motion, i.e., motions < 200 ps. Inline graphic curves are not affected by exchange contributions, have relatively small error margins, and are only weakly affected by variation in the CSA and overall rotation time. Thus, average approximate values for these parameters can be used without adversely affecting the correctness of the drawn conclusions.