Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 1;13:1969759. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1969759

Figure 3.

Forest plots comparing the highest versus lowest exposure quartiles for PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 in relation to cataract-related outcomes. Each analysis includes estimates from Chua et al. (2021) and Shin et al. (2020), with squares and horizontal lines representing study-specific hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals and diamonds representing pooled random-effects estimates. The pooled HRs are 1.029 for PM2.5, 1.041 for PM10, and 1.094 for NO2. Heterogeneity is high for PM2.5, moderate for PM10, and minimal for NO2.

Random-effects meta-analyses comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles of ambient air-pollutant exposure and cataract outcomes. PM₂.₅: HR for Q4 vs. Q1, PM₁₀: HR for Q4 vs. Q1, NO₂: HR for Q4 vs. Q1. An HR >1 indicates a higher rate of the cataract-related outcome with greater pollutant exposure, whereas an HR <1 indicates a lower rate.