Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb;50(2):474–479. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.474-479.2006

TABLE 1.

Summary of MICs against L. tarentolae and L. majora

NSC compound no. MIC (μg/ml)
Concn (μg/ml) tested with macrophages Efficacy in macrophage model
L. tarentolae L. major
377 0.015 0.25 0.03
4972 0.2 1 0.4
687330 20 5 2
108944 11 5.5 1.1
163443 15.5 8 1.6
635975 8 8 0.8
165883 0.5 9 0.9
46613 9.5 9.5 1
63984 10 10 1
634650 10 10 1
112789 11 10.5 1.1
150169 10.5 10.5 1.1
97703 11 11 1.1
687667 11 11 1.1
168466 2.5 11 1.1
150554 1.5 11.5 1.2
50155 3 11.5 1.2
58319 3 12 1.2
128305 12.5 12.5 1.3
648422 109 13 1.3
89110 3 13 6.5
369294 109 13.5 11
647613 14 14 1.4
57584 14 14 1.4
281245 15.5 15.5 1.6
62791 16 16 1.6
176555 132 16.5 13
99504 67 17 13
273829 17.5 17.5 1.8
63984 10 20 1
13726 6.5 27 13.6
118770 7 27 11
7962 1.5 28.5 3.5
83633 29 29 12 +
62791 16 31.5 1.6
32673 0.13 33 0.3
56939 0.3 34.5 0.5
69298 5 38 9.5
281668 37 74 7.4
1199 11 90 9
351520 6.5 106 10.6 +
13512 29.5 117 12 +
35761 70.5 140 7
128164 38 152 15
73109 156 156 15.6
Pentostam Not tested 250 75 +
a

The MIC values against L. tarentolae and L. major were determined as described in Materials and Methods. In addition, the efficacy of each compound tested at the indicated concentrations in the macrophage infection model was determined as described in the Materials and Methods (+, activity; −, no activity).