Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 16;88:677–688. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.034

Table 3.

ANOVA of the Model 1 all investigated three-way interaction terms of the model.

Variable/Effect Chisq p-value
Treatment: Flowrate: Buffer capacity 0.198 0.648
Treatment: Flowrate: pH value 0.989 0.309
Treatment: Flowrate: DMFT 0.475 0.492
Treatment: Flowrate: Plaque index 0.286 0.592
Treatment: Flowrate: Gingivits index 9.588 0.002 (**)
Treatment: Buffer capacity: pH value 0.896 0.342
Treatment: Buffer capacity: DMFT 35.118 <0.001 (***)
Treatment: Buffer capacity: Plaque index 5.049 0.020 (*)
Treatment: Buffer capacity: Gingivits index 0.225 0.638
Treatment: pH value: DMFT 16.552 <0.001 (***)
Treatment: pH value: Plaque index 0.003 0.953
Treatment: pH value: Gingivits index 0.458 0.516
Treatment: DMFT: Plaque index 5.193 0.019 (*)
Treatment: DMFT: Gingivits index 19.869 <0.001 (***)
Treatment: Plaque index: Gingivits index 9.346 0.002 (**)

Interaction terms from the ANOVA model. The colon (“:”) indicates interactions between the specified factors. Treatment = Test drink or Placebo, DMFT = decay missing filled teeth, Plaque Index [22], Gingivitis index [23], pH value = pH value of the unstimulated saliva, Buffer capacity = Buffer capacity of the unstimulated saliva, Flowrate = Flowrate of the stimulated saliva.