Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 28;90(2):544–551. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.071290

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the experimental Rg with the calculated sDNA fitted parameters as a function of temperature using the cylindrical structural model

Diameter (Å) Length (Å) Rg (Å) X2, R2 3D model from LORES
25°C 6.1 ± 0.1* 29.8 ± 0.5 8.8 ± 0.1 (9 ± 1) 0.09319, 0.6965 graphic file with name biophysj00071290T03_01.jpg
34°C 14.9 ± 0.4 28.3 ± 0.9 9.6 ± 0.1 (10 ± 1) 0.1482, 0.4752 graphic file with name biophysj00071290T03_02.jpg
43°C 23.0 ± 0.5 21.9 ± 0.8 10.3 ± 0.1 (11 ± 1) 0.2148, 0.4749 graphic file with name biophysj00071290T03_03.jpg
53°C 14.7 ± 0.5 30.5 ± 1.0 10.1 ± 0.1 (10 ± 1) 0.2251, 0.2391 graphic file with name biophysj00071290T03_04.jpg
71°C 25.4 ± 0.7 68.2 ± 1.5 21.7 ± 0.4 (19 ± 2) 0.1381, 0.6727 graphic file with name biophysj00071290T03_05.jpg
80°C 22.5 ± 0.6 78.3 ± 1.0 24.3 ± 0.3 (24 ± 2) 0.1686, 0.5884 graphic file with name biophysj00071290T03_06.jpg
*

The deviation is calculated from running LORES 15 times with same criteria. The values in parentheses are the experimental Rg values.