Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 15. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1039/d6ra08420f

Table 13. Comparison of alginate-chitosan-Fe3O4 performance with other reported materials.

Adsorbent As(v) adsorption capacity (mg g−1) PO43− adsorption capacity (mg g−1) Contact time (min) pH@maximum adsorption Ref.
Magnesium-alginate/chitosan modified biochar microspheres — 46.56 30 7 74
Polyvinyl alcohol/metal ions sodium alginate hydrogel beads — 34.2 240 4 75
Bimetallic Zr/Fe-modified chitosan hydrogels — 126.50 240 7 14
TiO2@chitosan/alginate nanocomposite 202.27 — 100 5 70
Core–shell/bead-like ethylenediamine-functionalized Al-pillared montmorillonite/calcium alginate 61.94 — 150 4 76
Magnetic composite microparticles based on Fe3O4, TiO2 and chitosan/quaternary ammonium salt chitosan derivatives 34.61 — 120 7 23
Alginate-chitosan-Fe3O4 nanocomposite 114.5 138.2 240 6.5 This work