Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Oct 17.
Published before final editing as: Clin Infect Dis. 2026 May 26:ciag327. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciag327

Table 2.

Days of Therapy Negative Binomial Regression Model

Variable Rate Ratio (95% CI) P Value

Implementation group
 Pre-I (Ref) 1 …
 Post-I 0.34 (.26–.44) <.01
Age 1.0 (.98–1.03) .77
Sex
 Male (Ref) 1 …
 Female 1.0 (.98–1.0) .77
Race
 White (Ref) 1 …
 Asian 0.93 (.50–1.85) .80
 Black 1.21 (.87–1.69) .27
 Other 0.86 (.53–1.44) .54
Underlying diagnosis
 ALL (Ref) 1 …
 AML 0.87 (.64–1.16) .33
 Othera 0.81 (.58–1.13) .21
Conditioning regimen
 Myeloablative (Ref) 1 …
 Reduced intensity 1.0 (.64–1.53) .98
 Nonmyeloablative 1.10 (.41–3.14) .85

Statistically significant P-values (P < 0.05) are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CI, confidence interval; Post-I, postimplementation; Pre-I, preimplementation.

a

Other underlying diagnoses include: acute megakaryocytic leukemia (6), acute myelomonocytic leukemia (3), acute promyelocytic leukemia (1), mixed phenotype acute leukemia (6), chronic myeloid leukemia (1), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (1), Hodgkin lymphoma (3), myelodysplastic syndrome (6), myeloid sarcoma (1), other unclassified leukemia or lymphoma (3), aplastic anemia (4), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (1), myeloid aplasia (1), sickle cell disease (5), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (1), Ewing sarcoma (1), neuroblastoma (1).