Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec 9;90(5):1687–1696. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.055483

TABLE 1.

Features of four different methods to evaluate microtubule rigidity

Methods Process Analysis Working force on MT (P) Force balance Force direction Number of force fulcrums Manipulation force
Buckling force Static Classical mechanics Compressive force P = F (keep buckling) P = F Two points Optical trap(s)
Hydrodynamic flow Static Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamic drag force P(s) = F(s) (keep bending) P(s) = F(s) Continuous Fluid flow
Relaxation Dynamic Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamic drag force P(s,t) < F(s,t) (relaxation) P(s,t) = F(s,t) Continuous Optical trap
Thermal fluctuation Dynamic Statistical mechanics Thermal force + Hydrodynamic drag force P(s,t) > F(s,t) (bending) P(s,t) = F(s,t) P(s,t) < F(s,t) (relaxation) P(s,t) ≠ F(s,t) P(s,t) = F(s,t) Continuous Nothing

The value s is the distance along a microtubule, and t is the time.