Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 16;18(9):e116350. doi: 10.7759/cureus.116350

Table 2. ONIHL prevalence among the participants (n = 312).

* Statistically significant. One expected cell count was <5 (minimum expected count = 4.62); therefore, statistical significance was additionally verified using a Monte Carlo exact test (p < 0.001).

CTC, crushing-tearing-curling; ONIHL, occupational noise-induced hearing loss

Job station Noise level exposure, dBA ONIHL present ONIHL absent ONIHL prevalence, n/N (%) 95% CI Chi-square value p-value
Range Leq, 8h, dBA Median (IQR) Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
CTC room 82-86 85.3 85.2 (84.0-86.9) 60 66.7 74 33.3 60/134 (44.8) 36.6-53.2 37.434 <0.001*
Withering room 70-84 80.7 79.8 (77.8-81.6) 11 12.2 28 12.6 11/39 (28.2) 16.5-43.8
Drying room 66-74 72.8 73.8 (72.2-74.2) 3 3.3 26 11.7 3/29 (10.3) 3.6-26.4
Sorting room 62-74 66.7 66.6 (66.4-67.1) 2 2.2 24 10.8 2/26 (7.7) 2.1-24.1
Packing room 60-74 66.5 66.8 (66.1-67.2) 4 4.4 25 11.3 4/29 (13.8) 5.5-30.6
Maintenance staff 55-93 85.1 83.1 (81.8-88.9) 6 6.7 10 4.5 6/16 (37.5) 18.5-61.4
Administrative office staff 50-66 60.6 62.6 (62.1-63.4) 4 4.4 35 15.8 4/39 (10.2) 4.1-23.6
Total - - - 90 100 222 100 90/312 (28.8) 24.1-34.1