Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 18;58(8):609. doi: 10.1007/s11250-026-05430-x

Table 6.

Performance and blood metabolites of Nellore bulls finished on tropical pasture and fed a Bacillus-based probiotic

Days Treatments* SEM1 P – value2
Control Probiotic Treatment
Body weight, kg
0 503.66 501.53 7.271 0.69
28 530.72 525.48 2.760 0.21
56 556.57 537.96 4.078 < 0.01
84 587.86 571.12 4.217 0.01
112 600.47 582.94 4.364 0.02
Average daily gain, kg
0–28 1.11 0.92 0.098 0.21
0–56 1.01 0.68 0.062 < 0.01
0–84 1.05 0.85 0.050 0.01
0–112 0.91 0.75 0.039 0.02
28–56 0.88 0.48 0.092 0.01
56–84 1.13 1.17 0.088 0.74
84–112 0.38 0.48 0.071 0.23
Feed efficiency, kg/kg
Pasture 0.129 0.128 0.0089 0.94
Supplement 0.495 0.448 0.0215 0.11
Overall 0.101 0.098 0.0058 0.76
Blood profile
 Glucose, mg/dL 86.82 95.06 6.646 0.41
 IGF-1, ng/mL 260.83 269.63 23.031 0.79

*CON; energy-protein supplement without any additive (n = 14) - Probiotic; energy-protein supplement containing 2 g of probiotic/animal per day (n = 14). The probiotic was composed of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis (6.4 × 10⁹ CFU/g). 1Standard error of mean;2 P-value; The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05, and 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10 was considered a tendency