Table 1.
Exposure definitiona | Fecal indicator | Definition of GE | NOAEL (MO/100 mL) | RR, bathing > NOAEL | 95% CI | aR (%), bathing > NOAEL | aR (%), SW ≤ NOAEL | aR (%), SW > NOAEL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | E. coli | UK | 180 | 3.55 | 1.79–7.02 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 3.9 |
UK-wf | 78 | 2.51 | 1.55–4.05 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 2.9 | ||
NL-2 | 167 | 1.96 | 1.32–2.89 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 3.3 | ||
Intestinal enterococci | UK | 24 | 3.2 | 1.64–6.27 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 3.7 | |
UK-wf | 21 | 2.67 | 1.65–4.32 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 3.4 | ||
NL-2 | 24 | 1.9 | 1.30–2.77 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 2.3 | ||
C. perfringens | UK | 13 | 3.34 | 1.72–6.51 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 4.1 | |
UK-wf | 13 | 2.61 | 1.60–4.25 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 3.3 | ||
NL-2 | 13 | 1.86 | 1.27–2.73 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 3.5 | ||
Somatic coliphages | UK | 150b | 4.61 | 2.1–10.11 | 5.1 | 1.3 | 6.7 | |
UK-wf | 10 | 2.47 | 1.51–4.04 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 2.8 | ||
NL-2 | 10 | 1.77 | 1.21–2.60 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||
2 | E. coli | UK | 1,453 | 4.41 | 2.17–8.96 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 5.3 |
UK-wf | —c | — | — | — | — | — | ||
NL-2 | 2,163 | 2.33 | 1.48–3.67 | 8.6 | 0.5 | 8.6 | ||
Intestinal enterococci | UK | 123 | 3.41 | 1.74–6.68 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 4.0 | |
UK-wf | 123 | 2.78 | 1.71–4.51 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 2.8 | ||
NL-2 | 145 | 1.93 | 1.31–2.84 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 1.6 | ||
C. perfringens | UK | 38 | 3.12 | 1.62–6.03 | 3.2 | −0.4 | 4.1 | |
UK-wf | 38 | 2.43 | 1.50–3.93 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 3.3 | ||
NL-2 | 36 | 1.71 | 1.18–2.47 | 4.6 | 0.0 | 3.2 | ||
Somatic coliphages | UK | 330 | 3.77 | 1.87–7.61 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 3.2 | |
UK-wf | 50 | 2.44 | 1.49–3.98 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 2.7 | ||
NL-2 | 119 | 1.76 | 1.18–2.62 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 3.1 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GE, gastroenteritis; MO, microorganisms; SW, swallowing water.
Exposure definitions 1 and 2 as explained in “Materials and Methods.”
Value is probably too high because of a second local minimum of the Pearson’s chi-squared p-values.
Potential NOAEL estimate does not fulfill all criteria of validity (incidence rate of bathers below NOAEL is significantly lower than incidence rate of nonbathers).