Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1967 Jan;7(1):95–110. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(67)86577-9

Elastic-Mathematical Theory of Cells and Mitochondria in Swelling Process

The Membranous Stresses and Modulus of Elasticity of the Egg Cell of Sea Urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

M J Mela
PMCID: PMC1368059  PMID: 19210984

Abstract

To the revolution-ellipsoidal and spherical membranous shell (cell mitochondrion) are introduced the equations for the calculation of both the modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) and the stresses, which exist at the membrane. The existing pressure difference between the inner and outer surface of the membrane is calculated in the dilution of seawater media in the osmotic steady state. The experimental results are obtained by using egg cells of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Up to the specific volume of the egg cell (VE ≈ 35·10-8 cm3) Boyle-van't Hoff's law is valid (defined as the subelastic range) beyond that the elastic stresses exist (elastic range). For the maximum value of the stresses existing at the cell wall one obtains σ ≈ 5.5·106 dyne/cm2 and for the modulus of elasticity E = 1.0·107 dyne/cm2, which is constant when the value of relative strain εν > 15%. The breaking limit by an approximate calculation is σU ≈ 11·106 dyne/cm2. The membrane is assumed to be convoluted and its hypothetical degree of folding was calculated [unk]a = 34%. The results are compared with the values existing in the literature and other types of cells are found to have values of elasticity in the same range as values of the membrane of S. purpuratus. Both compression and cell elastometer methods are criticized and in certain cases results of these methods are considered to belong to the subelastic domain.

Full text

PDF
95

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DICK D. A. Osmotic properties of living cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1959;8:387–448. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62736-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Glaeser R. M., Hayes T., Mel H., Tobias C. Membrane structure of OsO4-fixed erythrocytes viewed "face on" by electron microscope techniques. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Jun;42(3):467–477. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(66)90260-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HIRAMOTO Y. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SEA URCHIN EGGS. I. SURFACE FORCE AND ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE CELL MEMBRANE. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Oct;32:59–75. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. RAND R. P. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE RED CELL MEMBRANE. II. VISCOELASTIC BREAKDOWN OF THE MEMBRANE. Biophys J. 1964 Jul;4:303–316. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(64)86784-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rikmenspoel R. The tail movement of bull spermatozoa. Observations and model calculations. Biophys J. 1965 Jul;5(4):365–392. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86723-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. TEDESCHI H. Osmotic reversal of mitochondrial swelling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Jan 1;46:159–169. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90659-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES