Table 4.

Accuracy across conditions and inferential tests.

Panel A. Descriptive statistics
Variables (N)	Time	HE, M (SD)	LE, M (SD)	AC, M (SD)
Congruent ACC (N = 26)	Pre	0.971 (0.100)	0.964 (0.100)	0.918 (0.200)
	Post	0.972 (0.100)	0.972 (0.090)	0.966 (0.100)
	ΔACC	0.001 (0.020)	0.008 (0.042)	0.048 (0.151)
Incongruent ACC (HE = 26; LE = 25; AC = 26)	Pre	0.928 (0.100)	0.900 (0.200)	0.931 (0.100)
	Post	0.929 (0.100)	0.904 (0.200)	0.929 (0.100)
	ΔACC	0.001 (0.083)	0.004 (0.076)	−0.002 (0.140)
One participant was excluded from the LE incongruent ACC cell after trimming because no valid responses remained. Accuracy is expressed as a proportion ranging from 0 to 1. ACC, accuracy; ΔACC, post-test minus pre-test; HE, high cognitively demanding exercise; LE, low cognitively demanding exercise; AC, active control.

Panel B. Inferential statistics
Analysis (N)	Effect	F (df1, df2)	p	${\eta }_{\mathrm{p}}^2$	Pairwise comparisons
ACC change score (N = 25)	Condition	0.81 (1.34, 32.13)	0.409	0.03	—
	Congruency	4.83 (1, 24)	0.038	0.17	Incongruent < Congruent: t (24) = 2.20, p = 0.038, d = 0.24, 95% CI [0.01, 0.46]
	Condition × Congruency	1.32 (1.15, 27.49)	0.267	0.05	—

One participant was excluded from the LE incongruent ACC cell after trimming because no valid responses remained. ACC, accuracy; HE, high cognitively demanding exercise; LE, low cognitively demanding exercise; AC, active control.