Table 2.
HTMT ratios among the six measured constructs.
| Construct pair | HTMT | 95% percentile CI |
|---|---|---|
| EFD—EEX | 0.3124 | [0.2290, 0.3952] |
| PC—EEX | 0.4885 | [0.4061, 0.5656] |
| PC—EFD | 0.5145 | [0.4369, 0.5903] |
| RAC—EEX | 0.4200 | [0.3343, 0.5029] |
| RAC—EFD | 0.4863 | [0.4063, 0.5622] |
| RAC—PC | 0.5808 | [0.5079, 0.6515] |
| TAC—EEX | 0.3888 | [0.2998, 0.4752] |
| TAC—EFD | 0.5193 | [0.4435, 0.5920] |
| TAC—PC | 0.6572 | [0.5900, 0.7205] |
| TAC—RAC | 0.5795 | [0.5095, 0.6457] |
| TRC—EEX | 0.6058 | [0.5359, 0.6721] |
| TRC—EFD | 0.5135 | [0.4417, 0.5820] |
| TRC—PC | 0.3958 | [0.3128, 0.4747] |
| TRC—RAC | 0.6827 | [0.6192, 0.7417] |
| TRC—TAC | 0.6127 | [0.5425, 0.6773] |
The upper limit was below 0.85 for every pair. This diagnostic concerns the measured constructs and does not establish distinctiveness from unmeasured adjacent constructs.