Table 5.
Quantitative performance comparison between optimized WGAN-GP model and original WGAN-GP model.
| Model metric | Optimized WGAN-GP model | Original WGAN-GP model | Metric description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FID | 21.15 ± 1.31 | 24.72 ± 1.85 | Distance between the distribution of generated images and children’s hand-drawn sketches; lower values indicate better fitting performance |
| IS | 2.87 ± 0.16 | 2.41 ± 0.21 | Quantitative measurement of detail richness and creative diversity of generated images |
| LPIPS | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | Perceptual similarity between generated images and original sketches; lower values denote superior creative derivation effect |
| Loss convergence improvement rate | 29.7% | – | Percentage reduction in iterations required to reach the target loss value |
| R2 (pixel fitting coefficient of determination) | 0.912 ± 0.031 | 0.865 ± 0.042 | Pixel matching degree between generated images and children’s sketches |