Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 7;14:1945238. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1945238

Table 5.

Quantitative performance comparison between optimized WGAN-GP model and original WGAN-GP model.

Model metric Optimized WGAN-GP model Original WGAN-GP model Metric description
FID 21.15 ± 1.31 24.72 ± 1.85 Distance between the distribution of generated images and children’s hand-drawn sketches; lower values indicate better fitting performance
IS 2.87 ± 0.16 2.41 ± 0.21 Quantitative measurement of detail richness and creative diversity of generated images
LPIPS 0.13 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.03 Perceptual similarity between generated images and original sketches; lower values denote superior creative derivation effect
Loss convergence improvement rate 29.7% – Percentage reduction in iterations required to reach the target loss value
R2 (pixel fitting coefficient of determination) 0.912 ± 0.031 0.865 ± 0.042 Pixel matching degree between generated images and children’s sketches