Table 4.
Safety Considerations, Evidence Gaps, and Research Priorities for Peripartum Esketamine
| Safety Issue or Population | Current Evidence | Evidence Source | Principal Uncertainty | Clinical Implication | Research Priority | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transient neuropsychiatric effects | Dizziness, perceptual changes, dissociation, hallucinations, or dream-like experiences have been reported more frequently after esketamine; most reported events were brief and self-limited. | Obstetric RCTs and evidence syntheses | Definitions and ascertainment varied; patient acceptability and functional impact were inconsistently assessed. | Short-term neuropsychiatric effects require observation during and immediately after administration and should be incorporated into benefit–risk assessment. | Standardized adverse-event assessment and direct comparison of bolus, infusion, and PCIA regimens. | [7–9,63,64,75–78] |
| Maternal hemodynamics and hypertensive disorders | Transient increases in blood pressure or heart rate may occur, although major instability was uncommon in selected trial populations. | RCTs and evidence syntheses | Women with severe pre-eclampsia, uncontrolled hypertension, or major cardiovascular disease were commonly excluded or underrepresented. | Short-term tolerability findings in selected populations cannot be generalized to severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. | Dedicated prospective studies or registries in hypertensive and other high-risk obstetric populations. | [7–9,63,64,75,76] |
| Placental transfer and fetal exposure | Ketamine crosses the placenta rapidly after intravenous administration; animal data suggest that clinically relevant S-ketamine doses may not substantially reduce uterine blood flow. | Human placental-transfer study and animal experiment | Esketamine-specific maternal–fetal pharmacokinetic data are sparse, and animal uterine-perfusion findings may not translate directly to human pregnancy. | Maternal recovery should not be used as a surrogate for negligible fetal exposure; animal findings provide mechanistic context rather than proof of fetal safety. | Paired maternal, cord-blood, and neonatal pharmacokinetic studies. | [28,30] |
| Short-term neonatal outcomes | Studied regimens have not consistently worsened Apgar scores, neonatal neurobehavioral measures, or NICU admission. | Obstetric RCTs and cohorts | Most studies were not powered for uncommon neonatal events and assessed only early outcomes. | Findings are reassuring for short-term tolerability but should not be interpreted as established developmental safety. | Standardized neonatal endpoints and larger multicenter safety cohorts. | [29,39,40] |
| Lactation exposure | Ketamine and its metabolites were detected at low and rapidly declining concentrations in breast milk; estimated relative infant doses were below 1%. | Small human pharmacokinetic studies | Few participants; limited infant plasma and clinical outcome data; findings may not apply to all esketamine regimens. | Current evidence is insufficient to define a universal fixed breastfeeding-interruption interval. | Larger lactation pharmacokinetic studies incorporating infant exposure and clinical outcomes. | [31,32] |
| Developmental and early-pregnancy safety | Human early-pregnancy evidence is limited to case-level observation, while animal and broader preclinical studies raise potential neurobehavioral and developmental-neurotoxicity concerns. | Case report and preclinical studies | Species, dose, exposure duration, and developmental stage differ substantially from typical low-dose peripartum regimens; long-term human offspring data are lacking. | Preclinical findings should be regarded as signals for surveillance rather than estimates of human risk; neither safety nor harm can be inferred from isolated human cases. | Pregnancy exposure registries and long-term offspring neurodevelopmental follow-up. | [88–91] |
| Special obstetric populations | Exploratory studies have included women with gestational diabetes, preoperative anxiety, and category-1 cesarean delivery. | Small RCTs, cohorts, or case series | Limited sample size, selection bias, and lack of replication. | Findings should not be generalized to all high-risk pregnancies. | Prespecified studies in clinically defined high-risk subgroups. | [83,92,93] |
| Combination regimens | Esketamine has frequently been combined with opioids, dexmedetomidine, or other analgesic agents. | RCTs | Independent efficacy and adverse effects attributable to esketamine are difficult to isolate. | Outcomes from combination regimens should not be attributed exclusively to esketamine. | Factorial or head-to-head comparative-effectiveness trials. | [33,41–43,94] |
Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PCIA, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia; RCT, randomized controlled trial.