Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 23;56(5):317–324. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2026.43884

Table 1. Comparison of the groups in terms of characteristics, glaucoma severity, and plasma spermine and spermidine concentrations.

-

POAG (n=51)

EG (n=44)

Control (n=39)

p value

Sex, n (%)

Female

30 (58.8)

20 (45.5)

20 (51.3)

0.425*

Male

21 (41.2)

24 (54.5)

19 (48.7)

Age (years), mean ± SD

66.7±9.2

67.0±6.6

63.9±7.6

0.067†

BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD

24.4±3.2

24.3±3.4

24.6±3.0

0.886‡

Modified Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson stage, n (%)

Stage 0

6 (11.8)

1 (2.3)

39 (100)

POAG vs. EG

0.019*

Stage 1

22 (43.1)

5 (11.4)

0

Stage 2

11 (21.6)

12 (27.3)

0

Stage 3

10 (19.6)

4 (9.1)

0

Stage 4

1 (2.0)

4 (9.1)

0

Stage 5

1 (2.0)

2 (4.5)

0

Unknown (no data)

0

16 (36.4)

0

Spermine (ng/mL), mean ± SD

358.7±124.7a

354.3±131.8a

307.0±157.5

0.005†

Spermidine (ng/mL), mean ± SD

5.08±1.45a

4.86±1.38a,b

4.34±1.13 b

0.037‡

POAG: Primary open-angle glaucoma, EG: Exfoliation glaucoma, BMI: Body mass index, SD: Standard deviation. *Pearson chi-square, †Kruskal-Wallis, ‡One-way ANOVA. p values in bold indicate the presence of statistical significance. Same letters denote the lack of statistical significance in pairwise comparisons (Dunn’s test with adjustment for multiple comparisons following Kruskal-Wallis; Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons following one-way ANOVA)