Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 14;17:1995413. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1995413

Table 2.

Association between glycemic biomarkers and prevalent CVD among adults with diabetes.

Model NHANES Clinical cohort
OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
Model 1
FBG 0.995 (0.962, 1.029) 0.776 1.033 (0.999, 1.069) 0.059
HbA1c 1.037 (0.974, 1.104) 0.254 1.437 (1.322, 1.567) <0.001
TyG 0.999 (0.868, 1.151) 0.992 1.008 (0.824, 1.231) 0.941
Model 2
FBG 1.023 (0.984, 1.064) 0.254 1.036 (0.998, 1.076) 0.062
HbA1c 1.115 (1.034, 1.202) 0.005 1.426 (1.302, 1.566) <0.001
TyG 1.157 (0.976, 1.371) 0.092 0.997 (0.798, 1.241) 0.976
Model 3
FBG 1.023 (0.983, 1.065) 0.258 1.035 (0.997, 1.074) 0.071
HbA1c 1.117 (1.038, 1.203) 0.004 1.429 (1.307, 1.568) <0.001
TyG 1.099 (0.924, 1.306) 0.283 0.989 (0.782, 1.231) 0.919
Model 4
FBG 1.023 (0.979, 1.069) 0.310 1.031 (0.991, 1.072) 0.136
HbA1c 1.097 (1.002, 1.202) 0.045 1.413 (1.280, 1.564) <0.001
TyG 0.975 (0.668, 1.423) 0.894 0.959 (0.757, 1.210) 0.723

Model 1 included no covariate adjustments. Model 2 was adjusted for age and sex, with additional adjustment for Race and PIR in the NHANES cohort. Model 3 was further adjusted for smoking status, drinking status, BMI, and hypertension. Model 4 was further adjusted for TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, eGFR, glucose-lowering medication use, insulin use, lipid-lowering medication use, antihypertensive medication use, and Hb. In the clinical cohort, Model 4 additionally included diabetes duration. Race/ethnicity and PIR were not included in the clinical cohort models because the clinical cohort consisted exclusively of Han Chinese participants and did not have standardized socioeconomic data. CVD, cardiovascular disease; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; TyG, triglyceride-glucose index; PIR, poverty-to-income ratio; BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb, hemoglobin.