Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 28;7:0701. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0701

Table 2.

Model performance using LOSO cross-validation. * indicates P < 0.05, ** indicates P < 0.01, and *** indicates P < 0.001. Boldface indicates the best performance for each dataset and metric.

Dataset Metric DGCNN/% ACRNN/% TSception/% Conformer/% LGGNet/% Deformer/% miMamba/% Ours/%
DEAP Arousal 57.12 ± 9.81 57.73 ± 15.62** 59.76 ± 10.58 62.30 ± 11.80 60.84 ± 7.94 60.36 ± 9.93 52.77 ± 6.53*** 61.29 ± 12.54
Valence 56.63 ± 8.95 55.31 ± 9.14*** 55.39 ± 7.78 58.51 ± 5.65 58.25 ± 4.30 57.75 ± 4.58 50.22 ± 3.11*** 58.80 ± 6.90
DREAMER Arousal 57.93 ± 8.17 58.75 ± 7.21*** 58.73 ± 6.81 59.41 ± 6.64 59.92 ± 8.83 59.57 ± 8.14 49.94 ± 6.46*** 61.96 ± 5.85
Valence 61.26 ± 7.29 61.58 ± 7.19** 64.60 ± 6.68 63.46 ± 8.29 63.63 ± 7.80 64.43 ± 8.12 45.86 ± 5.00*** 65.11 ± 7.21
CEED H/N/S 56.81 ± 8.30 58.23 ± 15.37 58.08 ± 9.91 59.32 ± 9.24 59.00 ± 8.70 58.86 ± 9.68 33.91 ± 2.53*** 59.59 ± 9.75

LOSO, leave-one-subject-out; DGCNN, dynamical graph convolutional neural network, ACRNN, attention-based convolutional recurrent neural network; H/N/S, happy/neutral/sad