Skip to main content
. 2026 Oct 15;16:1900671. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1900671

Table 2.

Quantitative agreement between the Kehua assay and the two imported reference systems, including Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and Passing-Bablok regression.

Comparison Analyte n Pearson r Spearman r Lin’s CCC PB slope PB intercept
Kehua vs Freelite FLC-κ 133 0.988 0.974 0.986 0.989 0.223
Kehua vs Freelite FLC-λ 133 1.000 0.951 0.999 1.077 −0.787
Kehua vs Freelite κ/λ ratio 133 0.999 0.825 0.983 1.022 0.018
Kehua vs N Latex FLC-κ 122 0.991 0.978 0.984 0.870 1.063
Kehua vs N Latex FLC-λ 122 0.995 0.953 0.569 1.138 0.230
Kehua vs N Latex κ/λ ratio 122 0.998 0.834 0.922 0.733 0.123

CCC, concordance correlation coefficient; PB, Passing-Bablok regression. All P-values for Pearson correlation < 0.001. The reduced CCC for Kehua vs N Latex FLC-λ reflects the influence of a single extreme outlier with FLC-λ > 9–000 mg/L; Pearson correlation, which is on a different scale, remained excellent.