Table 3. Effect of PPG substitution on electrophoretic mobility of MGB-ODN conjugates.
aSequence | GC content | bRm | Rm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
X = G |
X = PPG |
A | d(ACCTGTATTCCTTGCC) | 8/16 | 1.00 | |
B | d(XTACAXCAAATXXAA) | 6/15 | 1.00 | |
11 | d(CAAATXXXXXXXXX) | 10/14 | 0.58 | 0.96 |
12 | d(ACAAATXXXXXXXX) | 9/14 | 0.42 | 0.97 |
13 | d(AACAAATXXXXXXX) | 8/14 | 0.37 | 0.95 |
14 | d(CAACAAATXXXXXX) | 8/14 | 0.35 | 0.95 |
15 | d(ACAACAAATXXXXX) | 7/14 | 0.32 | 0.98 |
16 | d(CACAACAAATXXXX) | 7/14 | 0.29 | 1.03 |
17 | d(CACAACAAATXXX) | 6/13 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
18 | d(AGCACAACAAATXX) | 6/14 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
aMGB-ODNs contained 5′-fluorescein, 3′-Q-MGB as shown in Figure 3. In sequence B, X = PPG. Sequences 11–18 contained either G or PPG at the indicated X positions.
bMobility relative to control (Rm) of G- and PPG-containing ODNs were measured by non-denaturing PAGE. Rm values were measured separately for G- and PPG-containing ODNs with respect to control ODNs A and B, respectively.