TABLE 6.
Evidence levels and critical appraisal of hydrogel-EV systems for skin wound healing.
| Highest evidence level | Representative studies | Wound/model types | Main findings | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro | (De Cesare et al., 2026; Nurfajrin et al., 2026) | Fibroblast/MSC-related skin-repair assays; human 1BR3 skin fibroblast model | EV-loaded hydrogels showed favorable cytocompatibility and promoted wound-relevant cellular responses, including fibroblast activity, migration/proliferation, and regenerative responses | Simplified cell-culture systems cannot reproduce the inflammatory, vascular, immune, metabolic, and mechanical complexity of wounds and provide no direct evidence regarding in vivo retention, biodistribution, systemic safety, or whole-wound efficacy |
| Small animal | (Li et al., 2021; Han et al., 2022; Song et al., 2023; Tang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023; Liu S. et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024; Liu B. et al., 2025; Meng et al., 2025; Vipin and Kumar, 2025; Zhang Y. et al., 2025; Subhan et al., 2026; Taghdi et al., 2026; Wang S. et al., 2026; Yang et al., 2026) | Predominantly mouse and rat models of full-thickness/acute, diabetic, infected, chronic inflammatory, and burn wounds | Collectively, EV-hydrogel systems improved wound closure and re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, collagen deposition/remodeling, and inflammatory regulation. Recent studies additionally evaluated controlled EV release, local retention/biodistribution, and defined molecular mechanisms | Evidence remains dominated by rodents. Rodent skin healing relies more strongly on contraction than human healing. Marked heterogeneity in EV source/preparation, hydrogel composition, EV dose, treatment regimen, wound model, follow-up duration, and outcome measures limits cross-study comparison and clinical extrapolation |
| Large animal | (Cui et al., 2026) | Porcine full-thickness skin excision model | Chitosan hydrogel combined with MSC-derived exosomes accelerated wound closure and epithelialization, reduced wound contraction and inflammation, enhanced angiogenesis and type I collagen deposition, and produced more mature skin architecture | Large-animal evidence remains extremely sparse. Independent replication, standardized dosing, EV release/retention, long-term safety remain insufficient |
| Human | Direct clinical hydrogel-EV wound-healing evidence not identified | Not applicable | Not applicable | Clinical efficacy, optimal EV dose, hydrogel formulation, treatment frequency, manufacturing consistency, long-term safety, and clinically meaningful endpoints remain to be established in prospective controlled human studies |
Studies were classified according to the highest level of experimental validation. Studies containing both in vitro and small-animal experiments were classified as small-animal evidence and were not duplicated in vitro evidence.