Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 8;26:348. doi: 10.1186/s12902-026-02431-7

Table 2.

Comparison of primary follow-up outcomes between the intervention and control groups

Outcome Total Intervention group Control group p value
(n = 91) (n = 45) (n = 46)
Ulcer healing (Primary endpoint)
Events (Healed), n (%) 66 (72.53%) 37 (82.22%) 29 (63.04%) 0.060
Competing events and censoring
Major Amputation, n (%) 9 (9.89%) 4 (8.89%) 5 (10.87%) 1.000
DFU-related death, n (%) 2 (2.20%) 1 (2.22%) 1 (2.17%) 1.000
Non-DFU-related death, n (%) 5 (5.49%) 1 (2.22%) 4 (8.70%) 0.361
Loss to follow-up, n (%) 9 (9.89%) 2 (4.44%) 7 (15.22%) 0.158

Data are n (%). The primary outcome (ulcer healing) was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test (P = 0.600). The P value for the final healing proportion (0.060) was derived from Pearson’s chi-square test. P values for other outcomes (major amputation, DFU-related death and non-DFU-related death, loss to follow-up) were derived from Fisher’s exact test. Patients who underwent major amputation, died, were lost to follow-up, or remained unhealed were censored in the time-to-event analysis

Abbreviations: DFU, Diabetic foot ulcer